{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BVerfG","senate":"2. Senat","decided":"2012-06-20","aktenzeichen":"2 BvR 2258/09","doktyp":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren\nDer Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird auf 100.000 € (in Worten: einhunderttausend Euro) festgesetzt.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","retrieved":"2026-07-03 21:00:54.864437+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"2. Senat","date":"2012-06-20","dockets":["2 BvR 2258/09"],"decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 20.06.2012 – 2 BvR 2258/09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird auf 100.000 € (in Worten: einhunderttausend Euro) festgesetzt.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Darmstadt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Darmstadt","date":"2009-06-24","docket":"2a StVK 717/09","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Frankfurt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Frankfurt","date":"2009-08-25","docket":"3 Ws 689/09","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2010-07-09","docket":"2 BvR 2258/09","decision_type":"Prozesskostenhilfebeschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bverfg/2010-07-09/2-bvr-2258-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2010-07-09/2-bvr-2258-09","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2010-09-07","docket":"2 BvR 2258/09","decision_type":"Prozesskostenhilfebeschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":5,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-03-27","docket":"2 BvR 2258/09","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rs20120327.2bvr225809","id":"bverfg/2012-03-27/2-bvr-2258-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-03-27/2-bvr-2258-09","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-06-20","docket":"2 BvR 2258/09","decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":null,"id":"bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-06-20/2-bvr-2258-09","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-03T21:00:54.864437+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}