{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"6. Zivilsenat","decided":"2011-09-19","aktenzeichen":"VI ZR 262/09","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nVI ZR 262/09\n\nvom\n\n19. September 2011\n\nin dem Rechtsstreit\n\nDer VI. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 19. September 2011 durch\nden Vorsitzenden Richter Galke, den Richter Zoll, die Richterin Diederichsen,\nden Richter Pauge und die Richterin von Pentz\n\nbeschlossen:\n\nDer Leitsatz in dem Urteil vom 21. Juni 2011 wird in der letzten\nZeile berichtigt:\n\nStatt \"21. Mai\" muss es heißen \"21. Juni\".\n\nGalke Zoll Diederichsen\n\nPauge von Pentz","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:59:32.532078+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"6. Zivilsenat","date":"2011-09-19","dockets":["VI ZR 262/09"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 19.09.2011 – VI ZR 262/09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-06-21","docket":"VI ZR 262/09","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2011-06-21/vi-zr-262-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-06-21/vi-zr-262-09","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":2,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-09-19","docket":"VI ZR 262/09","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-19/vi-zr-262-09","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-10-25","docket":"1 BvR 2720/11","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20121025.1bvr272011","id":"bverfg/2012-10-25/1-bvr-2720-11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-10-25/1-bvr-2720-11","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"EGMR","court_id":"egmr","court_as_stated":"Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte","date":"2018-11-27","docket":"28482/13","decision_type":"Entscheidung","ecli":"ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1127DEC002848213","id":"egmr/2018-11-27/28482-13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/egmr/2018-11-27/28482-13","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:59:32.532078+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}