{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"XII. Zivilsenat","decided":"2009-03-18","aktenzeichen":"XII ZB 92/08","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nXII ZB 92/08 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n18. März 2009 \n\nin der Familiensache \n\nDer XII. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 18. März 2009 durch \n\ndie Vorsitzende Richterin Dr. Hahne, die Richter Weber-Monecke, Fuchs, \n\nDr. Vézina und Dose \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDas Rubrum des Senatsbeschlusses vom 12. November 2008 \n\nwird wegen eines offensichtlichen Schreibfehlers dahin berichtigt, \n\ndass das Datum des angefochtenen Beschlusses \n\n16. April 2008 (nicht: 2004) \n\nlautet. \n\nHahne \n\nWeber-Monecke \n\nFuchs \n\nVézina \n\nDose \n\nVorinstanzen: \n\nAG Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler, Entscheidung vom 18.12.2007 - 6 F 367/07 - \n\nOLG Koblenz, Entscheidung vom 16.04.2008 - 13 UF 7/08 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","retrieved":"2026-07-10 19:20:37.694215+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"XII. Zivilsenat","date":"2009-03-18","dockets":["XII ZB 92/08"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 18.03.2009 – XII ZB 92/08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler","date":"2007-12-18","docket":"6 F 367/07","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Koblenz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Koblenz","date":"2008-04-16","docket":"13 UF 7/08","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2009-03-18","docket":"XII ZB 92/08","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-03-18/xii-zb-92-08","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T19:20:37.694215+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}