{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"III. Zivilsenat","decided":"2009-01-15","aktenzeichen":"III ZB 54/08","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nIII ZB 54/08\n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n15. Januar 2009 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\nDer III. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 15. Januar 2009 durch den \n\nVorsitzenden Richter Schlick, die Richter Dörr, Wöstmann, die Richterin Hars-\n\ndorf-Gebhardt und den Richter Seiters \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDer Beschluss des Senats vom 30. Oktober 2008 wird wegen ei-\n\nnes Schreibfehlers dahingehend berichtigt, dass in den Gründen \n\nunter I. zu Beginn des zweiten Absatzes das Wort \"Durchschrift\" \n\ndurch \"Durchsicht\" ersetzt wird. \n\nSchlick \n\n Dörr \n\nWöstmann \n\nHarsdorf-Gebhardt \n\nSeiters \n\nVorinstanzen: \n\nLG Wuppertal, Entscheidung vom 28.02.2008 - 3 O 288/06 - \n\nOLG Düsseldorf, Entscheidung vom 27.05.2008 - I-24 U 77/08 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","retrieved":"2026-07-10 19:09:01.050462+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"III. Zivilsenat","date":"2009-01-15","dockets":["III ZB 54/08"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 15.01.2009 – III ZB 54/08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Wuppertal","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Wuppertal","date":"2008-02-28","docket":"3 O 288/06","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Düsseldorf","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Düsseldorf","date":"2008-05-27","docket":"I-24 U 77/08","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2009-01-15","docket":"III ZB 54/08","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2009-01-15/iii-zb-54-08","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T19:09:01.050462+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}