{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"V. Zivilsenat","decided":"2008-02-21","aktenzeichen":"V ZR 33/07","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nV ZR 33/07 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n21. Februar 2008 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\n \n \n \n\nDer V. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofes hat am 21. Februar 2008 durch den \n\nVorsitzenden Richter Prof. Dr. Krüger und die Richter Dr. Klein, Dr. Lemke, \n\nDr. Schmidt-Räntsch und Dr. Czub \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDie Anhörungsrüge der Beklagten zu 1 gegen den Beschluss des \n\nSenats vom 20. Dezember 2007 wird zurückgewiesen. Das als \n\nübergangen gerügte Vorbringen ist vom Senat berücksichtigt worden. \n\nEs war unerheblich, weil sich aus dem dem Schreiben der Beklagten zu \n\n1 vom 19. November 1999 zugrunde liegenden Sachverhalt ein \n\nkonkreter Altlastenverdacht ergab. \n\nKrüger \n\nKlein \n\nLemke \n\nSchmidt-Räntsch \n\nCzub \n\nVorinstanzen: \nLG Berlin, Entscheidung vom 11.11.2005 - 36 O 278/03 - \nKG Berlin, Entscheidung vom 15.01.2007 - 26 U 218/05 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","retrieved":"2026-07-10 19:20:54.042491+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"V. Zivilsenat","date":"2008-02-21","dockets":["V ZR 33/07"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 21.02.2008 – V ZR 33/07","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Berlin","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Berlin","date":"2005-11-11","docket":"36 O 278/03","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"KG Berlin","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"KG Berlin","date":"2007-01-15","docket":"26 U 218/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2008-02-21","docket":"V ZR 33/07","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2008-02-21/v-zr-33-07","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T19:20:54.042491+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}