{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"I. Zivilsenat","decided":"2007-06-20","aktenzeichen":"I ZR 8/06","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nI ZR 8/06 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n20. Juni 2007 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\nDer I. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 20. Juni 2007 durch den Vorsitzen-\n\nden Richter Prof. Dr. Bornkamm und die Richter Pokrant, Prof. Dr. Büscher, \n\nDr. Bergmann und Dr. Kirchhoff \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDie Anhörungsrüge gegen den Senatsbeschluss vom 3. Mai 2007 \n\nwird auf Kosten des Klägers zurückgewiesen. \n\nDer Senat hat die mit der Anhörungsrüge vorgebrachten Gesichts-\n\npunkte im Rahmen der Prüfung und Entscheidung über die Nichtzu-\n\nlassungsbeschwerde berücksichtigt. \n\nBornkamm \n\nPokrant \n\nBüscher \n\nBergmann \n\nKirchhoff \n\nVorinstanzen: \nLG Braunschweig, Entscheidung vom 26.05.2004 - 9 O 3029/01 - \nOLG Braunschweig, Entscheidung vom 08.12.2005 - 2 U 85/04 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","retrieved":"2026-07-10 21:42:31.654643+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"I. Zivilsenat","date":"2007-06-20","dockets":["I ZR 8/06"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 20.06.2007 – I ZR 8/06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Braunschweig","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Braunschweig","date":"2004-05-26","docket":"9 O 3029/01","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Braunschweig","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Braunschweig","date":"2005-12-08","docket":"2 U 85/04","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2007-06-20","docket":"I ZR 8/06","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-06-20/i-zr-8-06","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T21:42:31.654643+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}