{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"IX. Zivilsenat","decided":"2007-03-19","aktenzeichen":"IX ZB 138/06","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nIX ZB 138/06 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n19. März 2007 \n\nin dem Insolvenzverfahren \n\nDer IX. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat durch den Vorsitzenden Richter \n\nDr. Gero Fischer und die Richter Dr. Ganter, Dr. Kayser, Vill und Dr. Detlev \n\nFischer \n\nam 19. März 2007 \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDer Senatsbeschluss vom 21. Dezember 2006 wird wegen offen-\n\nsichtlicher Unrichtigkeit dahin geändert, dass es in den Gründen \n\nbei Rn. 5 statt \"verneinende\" heißen muss: \"bejahende\". \n\nDr. Gero Fischer \n\nDr. Ganter \n\nDr. Kayser \n\nVill \n\nDr. Detlev Fischer \n\nVorinstanzen: \nAG Hamburg, Entscheidung vom 02.05.2006 - 67b IN 251/03 - \nLG Hamburg, Entscheidung vom 13.07.2006 - 326 T 58/06 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","retrieved":"2026-07-10 21:27:15.303562+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"IX. Zivilsenat","date":"2007-03-19","dockets":["IX ZB 138/06"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 19.03.2007 – IX ZB 138/06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Hamburg","date":"2006-05-02","docket":"67b IN 251/03","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hamburg","date":"2006-07-13","docket":"326 T 58/06","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2007-03-19","docket":"IX ZB 138/06","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-03-19/ix-zb-138-06","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T21:27:15.303562+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}