{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"III. Zivilsenat","decided":"2007-02-01","aktenzeichen":"III ZR 72/06","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nIII ZR 72/06\n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n1. Februar 2007 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\nDer III. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 1. Februar 2007 durch den \n\nVorsitzenden Richter Schlick und die Richter Dr. Wurm, Streck, Dörr und \n\nDr. Herrmann \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDie Kostenentscheidung in dem Senatsurteil vom 11. Januar 2007 \n\nwird wegen offenbarer Unrichtigkeit gemäß § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO wie \n\nfolgt berichtigt: \n\nDie Kosten des Revisionsrechtzugs haben die Beklagten zu tra-\n\ngen. \n\nSchlick \n\nWurm \n\nStreck \n\nDörr \n\nHerrmann \n\nVorinstanzen: \n\nAG Hamburg, Entscheidung vom 31.05.2005 - 48 C 254/04 - \n\nLG Hamburg, Entscheidung vom 23.02.2006 - 334 S 61/05 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 319","ref_norm":"319","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","retrieved":"2026-07-10 21:21:49.794985+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"III. Zivilsenat","date":"2007-02-01","dockets":["III ZR 72/06"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 01.02.2007 – III ZR 72/06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"ZPO/319","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"319","label":"§ 319 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Hamburg","date":"2005-05-31","docket":"48 C 254/04","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hamburg","date":"2006-02-23","docket":"334 S 61/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2007-02-01","docket":"III ZR 72/06","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-02-01/iii-zr-72-06","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T21:21:49.794985+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}