{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"V. Zivilsenat","decided":"2007-01-24","aktenzeichen":"V ZB 166/05","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nV ZB 166/05 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n24. Januar 2007 \n\nin dem Zwangsverwaltungsverfahren \n\n \n \n \n\nDer V. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofes hat am 24. Januar 2007 durch den \n\nVorsitzenden Richter Prof. Dr. Krüger und die Richter Dr. Klein, Dr. Lemke, \n\nDr. Schmidt-Räntsch und Dr. Roth \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDer Gegenstandwert des Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahrens für die \n\nanwaltliche Vertretung des Gläubigers und des Schuldners wird \n\nnach § 27 RVG auf 10.881.356,42 € festgesetzt (Anspruch, \n\nwegen dessen das Verfahren beantragt worden ist, zuzügl. \n\nNebenforderungen, wozu auch Zinsen gehören). Entgegen der \n\nRechtsauffassung der Schuldnerin steht § 32 RVG einer \n\nFestsetzung nach § 27 RVG nicht entgegen (vgl. § 33 Abs. 1 \n\nRVG). \n\nKrüger \n\nKlein \n\nLemke \n\nSchmidt-Räntsch \n\nRoth \n\nVorinstanzen: \nAG Berlin-Neukölln, Entscheidung vom 01.06.2005 - 70 L 498/04 - \nLG Berlin, Entscheidung vom 19.09.2005 - 81 T 483/05 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"RVG","ref":"§ 27","ref_norm":"27","n":2},{"jurabk":"RVG","ref":"§ 32","ref_norm":"32","n":1},{"jurabk":"RVG","ref":"§ 33","ref_norm":"33","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","retrieved":"2026-07-10 21:19:14.411615+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"V. Zivilsenat","date":"2007-01-24","dockets":["V ZB 166/05"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 24.01.2007 – V ZB 166/05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"RVG/27","law":"RVG","abbreviation":"RVG","ref":"27","label":"§ 27 RVG","mentions":2},{"id":"RVG/32","law":"RVG","abbreviation":"RVG","ref":"32","label":"§ 32 RVG","mentions":1},{"id":"RVG/33","law":"RVG","abbreviation":"RVG","ref":"33","label":"§ 33 RVG","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Berlin-Neukölln","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Berlin-Neukölln","date":"2005-06-01","docket":"70 L 498/04","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Berlin","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Berlin","date":"2005-09-19","docket":"81 T 483/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2007-01-24","docket":"V ZB 166/05","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2007-01-24/v-zb-166-05","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T21:19:14.411615+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}