{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"5. Strafsenat","decided":"2006-12-12","aktenzeichen":"5 StR 377/06","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"5 StR 377/06 \n(alt: 5 StR 220/04) \n\nBUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom 12. Dezember 2006 \nin der Strafsache \ngegen \n\n1. \n\n2. \n\nwegen Steuerhinterziehung u. a. \n\nDer 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 12. Dezember 2006 \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDie Revisionen der Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Land-\n\ngerichts Berlin vom 24. März 2006 werden nach § 349 Abs. 2 \n\nStPO als unbegründet verworfen. \n\nJeder Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels \n\nzu tragen. \n\nErgänzend bemerkt der Senat: \n\nDie Feststellungen tragen jedenfalls die Annahme eines besonders schweren \n\nFalles nach § 267 Abs. 3 Satz 1 StGB. Die verhängten Strafen sind auch an-\n\ngemessen (§ 354 Abs. 1a StPO). \n\nBasdorf Raum Brause \n\nSchaal Jäger","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-12-12/5-str-377-06","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"StGB","ref":"§ 267","ref_norm":"267","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 349","ref_norm":"349","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 354","ref_norm":"354","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-12-12/5-str-377-06","retrieved":"2026-07-10 21:11:07.951884+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2006-12-12/5-str-377-06","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Strafsenat","date":"2006-12-12","dockets":["5 StR 377/06"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 12.12.2006 – 5 StR 377/06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-12-12/5-str-377-06","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"StGB/267","law":"StGB","abbreviation":"StGB","ref":"267","label":"§ 267 StGB","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/349","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"349","label":"§ 349 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/354","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"354","label":"§ 354 StPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[],"has_records":false,"note":"No Verfahrensgang record names this decision. That says nothing about whether earlier or later decisions exist."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T21:11:07.951884+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}