{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"IX. Zivilsenat","decided":"2006-07-27","aktenzeichen":"IX ZB 134/05","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nIX ZB 134/05 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n27. Juli 2006 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\nDer IX. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 27. Juli 2006 durch den Vor-\n\nsitzenden Richter Dr. Gero Fischer und die Richter Dr. Ganter, Raebel, \n\nDr. Kayser und Dr. Detlev Fischer \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDer Beschluss vom 23. März 2006 wird im Tenor dahingehend be-\n\nrichtigt, dass es im zweiten Absatz in Zeile 3 richtigerweise heißen \n\nmuss: \n\n… Beschluss vom 10. März 2005 anstatt \n\n… Beschluss vom 1. März 2005. \n\nDr. Gero Fischer Dr. Ganter Raebel \n\n Dr. Kayser Dr. Detlev Fischer \n\nVorinstanzen: \n\nAG Zittau, Entscheidung vom 10.03.2005 - 5 C 53/05 - \n\nLG Görlitz, Entscheidung vom 13.04.2005 - 2 T 72/05 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","retrieved":"2026-07-10 20:45:41.479225+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"IX. Zivilsenat","date":"2006-07-27","dockets":["IX ZB 134/05"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 27.07.2006 – IX ZB 134/05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Zittau","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Zittau","date":"2005-03-10","docket":"5 C 53/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Görlitz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Görlitz","date":"2005-04-13","docket":"2 T 72/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2006-07-27","docket":"IX ZB 134/05","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-07-27/ix-zb-134-05","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T20:45:41.479225+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}