{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"IX. Zivilsenat","decided":"2006-05-05","aktenzeichen":"IX ZB 19/05","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nIX ZB 19/05 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n5. Mai 2006 \n\nin dem Insolvenzverfahren \n\nDer IX. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat durch den Vorsitzenden Richter \n\nDr. Fischer, die Richter Raebel, Vill, Cierniak und die Richterin Lohmann \n\nam 5. Mai 2006 \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDer Leitsatz zum Beschluss vom 9. März 2006 wird gemäß § 319 \n\nZPO dahin berichtigt, dass es statt 9. Februar 2006 richtig \n\n\"9. März 2006\" heißt. \n\nFischer Raebel Vill \n\n Cierniak Lohmann \n\nVorinstanzen: \n\nAG Köln, Entscheidung vom 20.09.2004 - 72 IK 97/01 - \n\nLG Köln, Entscheidung vom 07.12.2004 - 1 T 485/04 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 319","ref_norm":"319","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","retrieved":"2026-07-10 20:33:37.875573+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"IX. Zivilsenat","date":"2006-05-05","dockets":["IX ZB 19/05"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 05.05.2006 – IX ZB 19/05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"ZPO/319","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"319","label":"§ 319 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Köln","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Köln","date":"2004-09-20","docket":"72 IK 97/01","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Köln","court_id":"lg-koeln","court_as_stated":"Landgericht Köln","date":"2004-12-07","docket":"1 T 485/04","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:LGK:2004:1207.1T485.04.00","id":"lg-koeln/2004-12-07/1-t-485-04","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/lg-koeln/2004-12-07/1-t-485-04","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2006-05-05","docket":"IX ZB 19/05","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-05-05/ix-zb-19-05","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T20:33:37.875573+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}