{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"II. Zivilsenat","decided":"2006-01-16","aktenzeichen":"II ZB 15/05","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Abschrift \n\nBUNDESGERICHTSHOF \n\nII ZB 15/05 \n\nBESCHLUSS \n\nvom \n\n16. Januar 2006 \n\nin dem Rechtsstreit \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\nDer II. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofes hat am 16. Januar 2006 durch \n\nden Vorsitzenden Richter Prof. Dr. Goette und die Richter Dr. Kurzwelly, \n\nProf. Dr. Gehrlein, Dr. Strohn und Caliebe \n\nbeschlossen: \n\nDie Erinnerung des Beklagten gegen den Kostenansatz vom \n\n17. Oktober 2005 wird als unzulässig verworfen. \n\n Gründe:\n\nDer als Erinnerung (§ 66 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG) zu wertende „Widerspruch“ des \n\nBeklagten gegen den Kostenansatz vom 17. Oktober 2005 ist bereits unzuläs-\n\nsig, weil der Beklagte das Schreiben vom 12. Dezember 2005 nicht unterzeich-\n\nnet hat. Davon abgesehen entspricht die erhobene Gebühr den gesetzlichen \n\nVorgaben (§ 34 Abs. 1 GKG, KV Nr. 1820). \n\nGoette \n\nKurzwelly \n\nGehrlein \n\nStrohn \n\nCaliebe \n\nVorinstanzen: \nAG Dresden, Entscheidung vom 24.05.2005 - 108 C 10524/04 - \nLG Dresden, Entscheidung vom 04.07.2005 - 13 S 359/05 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"GKG 2004","ref":"§ 34","ref_norm":"34","n":1},{"jurabk":"GKG 2004","ref":"§ 66","ref_norm":"66","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","retrieved":"2026-07-10 20:15:01.398361+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"II. Zivilsenat","date":"2006-01-16","dockets":["II ZB 15/05"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 16.01.2006 – II ZB 15/05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":{"text":"Die Erinnerung des Beklagten gegen den Kostenansatz vom\n\n17. Oktober 2005 wird als unzulässig verworfen.","basis":"court_formula","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"GKG-2004/34","law":"GKG-2004","abbreviation":"GKG 2004","ref":"34","label":"§ 34 GKG 2004","mentions":1},{"id":"GKG-2004/66","law":"GKG-2004","abbreviation":"GKG 2004","ref":"66","label":"§ 66 GKG 2004","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Dresden","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Dresden","date":"2005-05-24","docket":"108 C 10524/04","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Dresden","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Dresden","date":"2005-07-04","docket":"13 S 359/05","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2006-01-16","docket":"II ZB 15/05","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2006-01-16/ii-zb-15-05","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T20:15:01.398361+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}