{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"5. Strafsenat","decided":"2003-03-25","aktenzeichen":"5 StR 90/03","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"5 StR 90/03\n\nBUNDESGERICHTSHOF\n\nBESCHLUSS\n\nvom 25. März 2003\nin der Strafsache\ngegen\n\nwegen Brandstiftung\n\nDer 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 25. März 2003\n\nbeschlossen:\n\nDie Revision des Angeklagten Q gegen das Urteil des\n\nLandgerichts Frankfurt (Oder) vom 26. August 2002 wird\n\nnach § 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegründet verworfen, jedoch\n\nmit der Maßgabe (§ 349 Abs. 4 StPO), daß die Verfallanord-\n\nnung (§§ 73, 73a StGB) bei diesem Angeklagten entfällt.\n\nDer Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels\n\nzu tragen.\n\nDer Verfallanordnung steht § 73 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StGB entgegen. Soweit auch\n\ngegen Nichtrevidenten Verfall angeordnet wurde, findet § 357 StPO keine\n\nAnwendung, da die Nichtrevidenten ganz oder teilweise für andere Taten, die\n\nnicht der revisionsgerichtlichen Beurteilung unterfallen, verurteilt worden\n\nsind. Der geringe Erfolg der Revision zieht keine Kostenermäßigung nach\n\n§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO nach sich.\n\nBasdorf Häger Gerhardt\n\nBrause Schaal","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2003-03-25/5-str-90-03-2","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"StGB","ref":"§ 73","ref_norm":"73","n":2},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 349","ref_norm":"349","n":2},{"jurabk":"StGB","ref":"§ 73a","ref_norm":"73a","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 357","ref_norm":"357","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 473","ref_norm":"473","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2003-03-25/5-str-90-03-2","retrieved":"2026-07-10 14:12:49.456824+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2003-03-25/5-str-90-03-2","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Strafsenat","date":"2003-03-25","dockets":["5 StR 90/03"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 25.03.2003 – 5 StR 90/03","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2003-03-25/5-str-90-03-2","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"StGB/73","law":"StGB","abbreviation":"StGB","ref":"73","label":"§ 73 StGB","mentions":2},{"id":"StPO/349","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"349","label":"§ 349 StPO","mentions":2},{"id":"StGB/73a","law":"StGB","abbreviation":"StGB","ref":"73a","label":"§ 73a StGB","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/357","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"357","label":"§ 357 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/473","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"473","label":"§ 473 StPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[],"has_records":false,"note":"No Verfahrensgang record names this decision. That says nothing about whether earlier or later decisions exist."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-10T14:12:49.456824+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}