{"status":"available","doknr":"KVRE400591201","ecli":null,"court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","decided":"2012-08-09","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1902/11","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Zulässigkeit einer Außenprüfung","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","retrieved":"2026-07-03 21:00:59.641016+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","date":"2012-08-09","dockets":["1 BvR 1902/11"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":null,"ids":{"doknr":"KVRE400591201","ecli":null},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 09.08.2012 – 1 BvR 1902/11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Zulässigkeit einer Außenprüfung","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 193 Abs 1 AO 1977","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"FG Münster","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"FG Münster","date":"2009-02-26","docket":"11 K 1273/07 AO","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"BFH","court_id":"bfh","court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2010-12-29","docket":"IV B 46/09","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bfh/2010-12-29/iv-b-46-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bfh/2010-12-29/iv-b-46-09","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BFH","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2011-05-17","docket":"IV S 3/11","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-08-09","docket":"1 BvR 1902/11","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":null,"id":"bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-08-09/1-bvr-1902-11","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-03T21:00:59.641016+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}