{"status":"available","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"5. Zivilsenat","decided":"2011-09-07","aktenzeichen":"V ZA 35/10","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Die Gegenvorstellung des Antragstellers gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom 29. Juli 2011 wird zurückgewiesen.\n1 Die Gegenvorstellung des Antragstellers gegen den seine Anhörungsrüge zurückweisenden Beschluss des Senats vom 29. Juli 2011 gibt keinen Anlass für eine abändernde Entscheidung. Der Senat hat bei seiner Entscheidung auch die von dem Antragsteller gegen das Berufungsurteil vorgebrachte Argumentation zur „Kompensation“ berücksichtigt, aber nicht für durchgreifend erachtet. Lemke Schmidt-Räntsch Stresemann Brückner Weinland","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:19:18.383688+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Zivilsenat","date":"2011-09-07","dockets":["V ZA 35/10"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 07.09.2011 – V ZA 35/10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Gegenvorstellung des Antragstellers gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom 29. Juli 2011 wird zurückgewiesen.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG München I","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG München I","date":"2010-03-04","docket":"22 O 21972/99","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG München","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG München","date":"2010-10-26","docket":"5 U 2320/10","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-04-07","docket":"V ZA 35/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-05-19","docket":"V ZA 35/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2011-05-19/v-za-35-10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-05-19/v-za-35-10","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-07-29","docket":"V ZA 35/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2011-07-29/v-za-35-10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-07-29/v-za-35-10","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2011-09-07","docket":"V ZA 35/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2011-09-07/v-za-35-10","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:19:18.383688+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}