{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220411.1bvr092219","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2022-04-11","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 922/19","doktyp":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verfassungsbeschwerde bzgl der Unzulässigkeit pressemäßiger Berichterstattung in kommunalen Amtsblättern erfolglos - Verletzung des Anspruchs auf rechtliches Gehör nicht hinreichend substantiiert dargelegt\nDie Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie mangels substantiierter Darlegung einer Verletzung von Art. 103 Abs. 1 GG unzulässig ist.\n1 Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen. 2 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"BVerfGG","ref":"§ 93d","ref_norm":"93d","n":1},{"jurabk":"GG","ref":"Art 103","ref_norm":"103","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:30:57.037968+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2022-04-11","dockets":["1 BvR 922/19"],"decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220411.1bvr092219","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220411.1bvr092219"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 11.04.2022 – 1 BvR 922/19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Verfassungsbeschwerde bzgl der Unzulässigkeit pressemäßiger Berichterstattung in kommunalen Amtsblättern erfolglos - Verletzung des Anspruchs auf rechtliches Gehör nicht hinreichend substantiiert dargelegt","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen, weil sie mangels substantiierter Darlegung einer Verletzung von Art. 103 Abs. 1 GG unzulässig ist.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"BVerfGG/93d","law":"BVerfGG","abbreviation":"BVerfGG","ref":"93d","label":"§ 93d BVerfGG","mentions":1},{"id":"GG/103","law":"GG","abbreviation":"GG","ref":"103","label":"Art 103 GG","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"Art 103 Abs 1 GG, § 23 Abs 1 S 2 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG, UWG","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Ellwangen","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Ellwangen","date":"2016-07-28","docket":"10 O 17/16","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Stuttgart","court_id":"olg-stuttgart","court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart","date":"2017-05-03","docket":"4 U 160/16","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:OLGSTUT:2017:0503.4U160.16.00","id":"olg-stuttgart/2017-05-03/4-u-160-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-stuttgart/2017-05-03/4-u-160-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2018-12-20","docket":"I ZR 112/17","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:201218UIZR112.17.0","id":"bgh/2018-12-20/i-zr-112-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-12-20/i-zr-112-17","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2019-02-13","docket":"I ZR 112/17","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2019:130219BIZR112.17.0","id":"bgh/2019-02-13/i-zr-112-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2019-02-13/i-zr-112-17","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2022-04-11","docket":"1 BvR 922/19","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220411.1bvr092219","id":"bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-04-11/1-bvr-922-19","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:30:57.037968+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}