{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220314.1bvr165521","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","decided":"2022-03-14","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1655/21","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Kammerbeschluss: Berichtigung eines offensichtlichen Schreibversehens\nDie offenbare Unrichtigkeit im Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 7. Februar 2022 wird dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 5 in Zeile 5 nach dem ersten Wort \"verfassungsrechtlichen\" das Wort \"Kontrolle\" ergänzt wird.\n1 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:30:38.835741+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","date":"2022-03-14","dockets":["1 BvR 1655/21"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220314.1bvr165521","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220314.1bvr165521"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 14.03.2022 – 1 BvR 1655/21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Kammerbeschluss: Berichtigung eines offensichtlichen Schreibversehens","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die offenbare Unrichtigkeit im Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 7. Februar 2022 wird dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 5 in Zeile 5 nach dem ersten Wort \"verfassungsrechtlichen\" das Wort \"Kontrolle\" ergänzt wird.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 90 BVerfGG, § 319 Abs 1 ZPO","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Böblingen","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Böblingen","date":"2021-02-18","docket":"16 F 1003/20","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Stuttgart","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Stuttgart","date":"2021-06-15","docket":"11 UF 69/21","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2022-02-07","docket":"1 BvR 1655/21","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220207.1bvr165521","id":"bverfg/2022-02-07/1-bvr-1655-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-02-07/1-bvr-1655-21","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2022-03-14","docket":"1 BvR 1655/21","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2022:rk20220314.1bvr165521","id":"bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2022-03-14/1-bvr-1655-21","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:30:38.835741+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}