{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201110.1bvr131920","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 3. Kammer","decided":"2020-11-10","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1319/20","doktyp":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung\nDie Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.\n1 Dem Erfolg der Verfassungsbeschwerde stehen dieselben Erwägungen entgegen, welche die Kammer in den Beschlüssen vom 11. August 2020 zu den Aktenzeichen 1 BvR 2654/17 und 1 BvR 1115/18 dargelegt hat und auf die verwiesen wird. 2 Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen. 3 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"BVerfGG","ref":"§ 93d","ref_norm":"93d","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:25:21.367348+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 3. Kammer","date":"2020-11-10","dockets":["1 BvR 1319/20"],"decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201110.1bvr131920","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201110.1bvr131920"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 10.11.2020 – 1 BvR 1319/20","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"BVerfGG/93d","law":"BVerfGG","abbreviation":"BVerfGG","ref":"93d","label":"§ 93d BVerfGG","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"ArbG Wiesbaden","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"ArbG Wiesbaden","date":"2017-02-22","docket":"6 Ca 1678/15","decision_type":"Teilurteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LAG Hessen","court_id":"lag-hessen","court_as_stated":"Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht","date":"2018-06-05","docket":"12 Sa 421/17","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:LAGHE:2018:0605.12SA421.17.00","id":"lag-hessen/2018-06-05/12-sa-421-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/lag-hessen/2018-06-05/12-sa-421-17","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BAG","court_id":"bag","court_as_stated":"BAG","date":"2020-01-22","docket":"10 AZR 387/18","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BAG:2020:220120.U.10AZR387.18.0","id":"bag/2020-01-22/10-azr-387-18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bag/2020-01-22/10-azr-387-18","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2020-11-10","docket":"1 BvR 1319/20","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201110.1bvr131920","id":"bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-11-10/1-bvr-1319-20","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:25:21.367348+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}