{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2020-02-12","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 2896/17","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Berichtigung eines Schreibversehens im Tenor eines Nichtannahmebeschlusses\nDer Beschluss über die Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 29. Januar 2018 wird nach Anhörung der Beschwerdeführerin in entsprechender Anwendung von § 118 Abs. 1 VwGO und § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 2 in Zeile 8 die Worte \"Satz 3\" durch die Worte \"Satz 4\" ersetzt werden.\n1 Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"VwGO","ref":"§ 118","ref_norm":"118","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 319","ref_norm":"319","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:21:10.048510+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2020-02-12","dockets":["1 BvR 2896/17"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 12.02.2020 – 1 BvR 2896/17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Berichtigung eines Schreibversehens im Tenor eines Nichtannahmebeschlusses","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Der Beschluss über die Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 29. Januar 2018 wird nach Anhörung der Beschwerdeführerin in entsprechender Anwendung von § 118 Abs. 1 VwGO und § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 2 in Zeile 8 die Worte \"Satz 3\" durch die Worte \"Satz 4\" ersetzt werden.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"VwGO/118","law":"VwGO","abbreviation":"VwGO","ref":"118","label":"§ 118 VwGO","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/319","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"319","label":"§ 319 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 90 BVerfGG, § 118 Abs 1 VwGO, § 319 Abs 1 ZPO","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Mainz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Mainz","date":"2017-10-09","docket":"33 F 267/17","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"AG Mainz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Mainz","date":"2017-10-09","docket":"33 F 268/17","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"OLG Koblenz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Koblenz","date":"2017-11-24","docket":"11 WF 939/17","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"OLG Koblenz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Koblenz","date":"2017-11-24","docket":"11 WF 940/17","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":5,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2018-01-29","docket":"1 BvR 2896/17","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rk20180129.1bvr289617","id":"bverfg/2018-01-29/1-bvr-2896-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-01-29/1-bvr-2896-17","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2019-12-05","docket":"1 BvR 2621/18","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2019:rk20191205.1bvr262118","id":"bverfg/2019-12-05/1-bvr-2621-18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2019-12-05/1-bvr-2621-18","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":7,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2020-02-12","docket":"1 BvR 2896/17","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617","id":"bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2020-02-12/1-bvr-2896-17","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:21:10.048510+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}