{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180207.1bvr201916","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat","decided":"2018-02-07","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 2019/16","doktyp":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren\nDer Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:13:36.572571+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat","date":"2018-02-07","dockets":["1 BvR 2019/16"],"decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180207.1bvr201916","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180207.1bvr201916"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 07.02.2018 – 1 BvR 2019/16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 90 BVerfGG, § 14 Abs 1 RVG, § 37 Abs 2 S 2 RVG","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Hannover","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Hannover","date":"2014-10-13","docket":"85 III 105/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Celle","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Celle","date":"2015-01-21","docket":"17 W 28/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-06-22","docket":"XII ZB 52/15","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:220616BXIIZB52.15.0","id":"bgh/2016-06-22/xii-zb-52-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-06-22/xii-zb-52-15","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2017-10-10","docket":"1 BvR 2019/16","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20171010.1bvr201916","id":"bverfg/2017-10-10/1-bvr-2019-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-10-10/1-bvr-2019-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2018-02-07","docket":"1 BvR 2019/16","decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180207.1bvr201916","id":"bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-02-07/1-bvr-2019-16","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:13:36.572571+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}