{"status":"available","doknr":"KVRE422591701","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20171025.2bvr090514","court":"BVerfG","senate":"2. Senat","decided":"2017-10-25","aktenzeichen":"2 BvR 905/14","doktyp":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren\nDer Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren wird auf 15.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfzehntausend Euro) festgesetzt.\n1 Die Festsetzung des Gegenstandswerts beruht auf § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 in Verbindung mit § 14 Abs. 1 RVG. Die objektive Bedeutung der Sache rechtfertigt eine Festsetzung des Gegenstandswerts über dem nach § 14 Abs. 1 RVG vorgesehenen Mindestbetrag von 5.000 Euro.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"RVG","ref":"§ 14","ref_norm":"14","n":2}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:12:40.571336+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"2. Senat","date":"2017-10-25","dockets":["2 BvR 905/14"],"decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20171025.2bvr090514","ids":{"doknr":"KVRE422591701","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20171025.2bvr090514"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 25.10.2017 – 2 BvR 905/14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren wird auf 15.000 Euro (in Worten: fünfzehntausend Euro) festgesetzt.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"RVG/14","law":"RVG","abbreviation":"RVG","ref":"14","label":"§ 14 RVG","mentions":2}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 90 BVerfGG, § 14 Abs 1 RVG, § 37 Abs 2 S 2 RVG","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"VG Chemnitz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"VG Chemnitz","date":"2010-02-25","docket":"3 K 928/08","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"VG Chemnitz","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"VG Chemnitz","date":"2010-08-24","docket":"3 K 925/08","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"OVG Sachsen","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht","date":"2012-09-18","docket":"2 A 736/10","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"OVG Sachsen","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht","date":"2012-09-18","docket":"2 A 524/10","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":5,"court":"BVerwG","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BVerwG","date":"2013-12-12","docket":"2 C 24/12","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":6,"court":"BVerwG","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BVerwG","date":"2013-12-12","docket":"2 C 26/12","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":7,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2017-05-23","docket":"2 BvR 883/14, 2 BvR 905/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20170523.2bvr088314","id":"bverfg/2017-05-23/2-bvr-883-14-2-bvr-905-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-05-23/2-bvr-883-14-2-bvr-905-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":8,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2017-10-25","docket":"2 BvR 905/14","decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20171025.2bvr090514","id":"bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-10-25/2-bvr-905-14","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":9,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2018-05-16","docket":"2 BvR 883/14","decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2018:rs20180516.2bvr088314","id":"bverfg/2018-05-16/2-bvr-883-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2018-05-16/2-bvr-883-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:12:40.571336+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}