{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20170109.1bvr158513","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat","decided":"2017-01-09","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1585/13","doktyp":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren\nDer Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","retrieved":"2026-09-12 04:23:52.808637+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat","date":"2017-01-09","dockets":["1 BvR 1585/13"],"decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20170109.1bvr158513","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20170109.1bvr158513"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 09.01.2017 – 1 BvR 1585/13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit wird auf 150.000 € (in Worten: einhundertfünfzigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 90 BVerfGG, § 14 Abs 1 RVG, § 37 Abs 2 S 2 RVG","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hamburg","date":"2004-10-08","docket":"308 O 90/99","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Hamburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg","date":"2006-06-07","docket":"5 U 48/05","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2008-11-20","docket":"I ZR 112/06","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2008-11-20/i-zr-112-06","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2008-11-20/i-zr-112-06","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"OLG Hamburg","court_id":"olg-hamburg","court_as_stated":"Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht","date":"2011-08-17","docket":"5 U 48/05","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:OLGHH:2011:0817.5U48.05.0A","id":"olg-hamburg/2011-08-17/5-u-48-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-hamburg/2011-08-17/5-u-48-05","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2012-12-13","docket":"I ZR 182/11","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2012-12-13/i-zr-182-11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2012-12-13/i-zr-182-11","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2016-05-31","docket":"1 BvR 1585/13","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rs20160531.1bvr158513","id":"bverfg/2016-05-31/1-bvr-1585-13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2016-05-31/1-bvr-1585-13","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":7,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2017-01-09","docket":"1 BvR 1585/13","decision_type":"Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im verfassungsgerichtlichen Verfahren","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rs20170109.1bvr158513","id":"bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-01-09/1-bvr-1585-13","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":8,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2017-06-01","docket":"I ZR 115/16","decision_type":"EuGH-Vorlage","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:010617BIZR115.16.0","id":"bgh/2017-06-01/i-zr-115-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-06-01/i-zr-115-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":9,"court":"EuGH","court_id":"eugh","court_as_stated":"Europäischer Gerichtshof","date":"2019-07-29","docket":"C-476/17","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:EU:C:2019:624","id":"eugh/2019-07-29/c-476-17","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/eugh/2019-07-29/c-476-17","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":10,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-04-30","docket":"I ZR 115/16","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:300420UIZR115.16.0","id":"bgh/2020-04-30/i-zr-115-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-04-30/i-zr-115-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":11,"court":"OLG Hamburg","court_id":"olg-hamburg","court_as_stated":"Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht","date":"2022-04-28","docket":"5 U 48/05","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:OLGHH:2022:0428.5U48.05.00","id":"olg-hamburg/2022-04-28/5-u-48-05","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-hamburg/2022-04-28/5-u-48-05","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":12,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2023-09-14","docket":"I ZR 74/22","decision_type":"EuGH-Vorlage","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2023:140923BIZR74.22.0","id":"bgh/2023-09-14/i-zr-74-22","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2023-09-14/i-zr-74-22","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":13,"court":"EuGH","court_id":"eugh","court_as_stated":"Europäischer Gerichtshof","date":"2026-04-14","docket":"C-590/23","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:EU:C:2026:290","id":"eugh/2026-04-14/c-590-23","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/eugh/2026-04-14/c-590-23","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":14,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2026-09-03","docket":"I ZR 74/22","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2026:030926UIZR74.22.0","id":"bgh/2026-09-03/i-zr-74-22","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2026-09-03/i-zr-74-22","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-09-12T04:23:52.808637+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}