{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20160609.1bvr289515","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2016-06-09","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 2895/15","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung\nDie Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","retrieved":"2026-07-04 04:10:48.343641+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2016-06-09","dockets":["1 BvR 2895/15"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20160609.1bvr289515","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20160609.1bvr289515"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 09.06.2016 – 1 BvR 2895/15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.\n\nDiese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 1 AMRabG","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG München I","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG München I","date":"2013-09-18","docket":"29 O 18909/12","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG München","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG München","date":"2014-05-08","docket":"23 U 4155/13","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2015-04-30","docket":"I ZR 127/14","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2015-04-30/i-zr-127-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2015-04-30/i-zr-127-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2016-06-09","docket":"1 BvR 2895/15","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2016:rk20160609.1bvr289515","id":"bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2016-06-09/1-bvr-2895-15","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T04:10:48.343641+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}