{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150910.1bvr181715","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2015-09-10","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1817/15","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahme ohne Begründung: Verjährungshemmende Wirkung der Einleitung eines Güteverfahrens - Individualisierung des Anspruchs im Güteantrag\nDie Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen. Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","retrieved":"2026-07-04 05:48:52.729687+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2015-09-10","dockets":["1 BvR 1817/15"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150910.1bvr181715","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150910.1bvr181715"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 10.09.2015 – 1 BvR 1817/15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahme ohne Begründung: Verjährungshemmende Wirkung der Einleitung eines Güteverfahrens - Individualisierung des Anspruchs im Güteantrag","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.\n\nDiese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 23 Abs 1 S 2 BVerfGG, § 92 BVerfGG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 195 BGB, § 199 Abs 3 S 1 Nr 1 BGB, § 204 Abs 1 Nr 4 BGB","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Hannover","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hannover","date":"2013-12-12","docket":"8 O 107/13","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Celle","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Celle","date":"2014-05-26","docket":"11 U 15/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2015-06-18","docket":"III ZR 198/14","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bgh/2015-06-18/iii-zr-198-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2015-06-18/iii-zr-198-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2015-09-10","docket":"1 BvR 1817/15","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150910.1bvr181715","id":"bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-09-10/1-bvr-1817-15","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T05:48:52.729687+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}