{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512","court":"BVerfG","senate":"2. Senat 1. Kammer","decided":"2015-02-16","aktenzeichen":"2 BvR 1615/12","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeldzahlung an nur einen Berechtigten (§ 64 Abs 1 EStG)","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"EStG","ref":"§ 64","ref_norm":"64","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","retrieved":"2026-07-04 05:49:19.748870+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"2. Senat 1. Kammer","date":"2015-02-16","dockets":["2 BvR 1615/12"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 16.02.2015 – 2 BvR 1615/12","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeldzahlung an nur einen Berechtigten (§ 64 Abs 1 EStG)","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"EStG/64","law":"EStG","abbreviation":"EStG","ref":"64","label":"§ 64 EStG","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 64 Abs 1 EStG 2009","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"FG Düsseldorf","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"FG Düsseldorf","date":"2011-07-19","docket":"10 K 2787/10 Kg","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"BFH","court_id":"bfh","court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2012-02-15","docket":"XI S 25/11 (PKH)","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":"bfh/2012-02-15/xi-s-25-11-pkh","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bfh/2012-02-15/xi-s-25-11-pkh","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2015-02-16","docket":"2 BvR 1615/12","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2015:rk20150216.2bvr161512","id":"bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2015-02-16/2-bvr-1615-12","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-04T05:49:19.748870+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}