{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr139511","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","decided":"2012-05-29","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 1395/11","doktyp":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung\nDie Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai 2012 - 1 BvR 640/11 -). Von einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen. Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"BVerfGG","ref":"§ 93d","ref_norm":"93d","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","retrieved":"2026-07-03 21:00:53.186472+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 1. Kammer","date":"2012-05-29","dockets":["1 BvR 1395/11"],"decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr139511","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr139511"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 29.05.2012 – 1 BvR 1395/11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss: Parallelentscheidung","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen (vgl. Beschluss der 1. Kammer des Ersten Senats vom 29. Mai 2012 - 1 BvR 640/11 -).\n\nVon einer weiteren Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.\n\nDiese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"BVerfGG/93d","law":"BVerfGG","abbreviation":"BVerfGG","ref":"93d","label":"§ 93d BVerfGG","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"FG Münster","court_id":"fg-muenster","court_as_stated":"Finanzgericht Münster","date":"2009-08-13","docket":"5 K 2784/07 U","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:FGMS:2009:0813.5K2784.07U.00","id":"fg-muenster/2009-08-13/5-k-2784-07-u","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/fg-muenster/2009-08-13/5-k-2784-07-u","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":2,"court":"BFH","court_id":"bfh","court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2010-09-16","docket":"V R 48/09","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"bfh/2010-09-16/v-r-48-09","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bfh/2010-09-16/v-r-48-09","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BFH","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2011-03-31","docket":"V S 4/11","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-05-29","docket":"1 BvR 1395/11","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120529.1bvr139511","id":"bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-05-29/1-bvr-1395-11","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-03T21:00:53.186472+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}