{"status":"available","doknr":"KVRE399001201","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120413.2bvr139510","court":"BVerfG","senate":"2. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2012-04-13","aktenzeichen":"2 BvR 1395/10","doktyp":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeld - Keine Berücksichtigung eines volljährigen Kindes bei Unterbrechung der Berufsausbildung zur Betreuung eigener Kinder","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","retrieved":"2026-07-03 21:00:50.887233+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"2. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2012-04-13","dockets":["2 BvR 1395/10"],"decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120413.2bvr139510","ids":{"doknr":"KVRE399001201","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120413.2bvr139510"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 13.04.2012 – 2 BvR 1395/10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Kindergeld - Keine Berücksichtigung eines volljährigen Kindes bei Unterbrechung der Berufsausbildung zur Betreuung eigener Kinder","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"GG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 32 Abs 4 S 1 Nr 2 Buchst a EStG 1997, § 32 Abs 4 S 1 Nr 2 Buchst a EStG 2002","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"FG Sachsen-Anhalt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt","date":"2005-05-31","docket":"4 K 535/02","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"BFH","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2009-09-24","docket":"III R 79/06","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BFH","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"BFH","date":"2010-03-25","docket":"III S 5/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2012-04-13","docket":"2 BvR 1395/10","decision_type":"Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:rk20120413.2bvr139510","id":"bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2012-04-13/2-bvr-1395-10","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-03T21:00:50.887233+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}