{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100129.1bvr303108","court":"BVerfG","senate":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","decided":"2010-01-29","aktenzeichen":"1 BvR 3031/08","doktyp":"Prozesskostenhilfebeschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"PKH-Bewilligung und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts\nDem Beschwerdeführer wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren Prozesskostenhilfe ohne Ratenzahlung bewilligt und Rechtsanwalt Dr. W., beigeordnet.","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","retrieved":"2026-07-03 20:59:34.668533+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","panel":"1. Senat 2. Kammer","date":"2010-01-29","dockets":["1 BvR 3031/08"],"decision_type":"Prozesskostenhilfebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100129.1bvr303108","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100129.1bvr303108"},"cite_as":"BVerfG, Beschluss vom 29.01.2010 – 1 BvR 3031/08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","headnotes":[{"kind":"titelzeile","author":"dokumentationsstelle","text":"PKH-Bewilligung und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts","basis":"source_field","source":null}],"leitsatz_status":"none_in_source","tenor":{"text":"Dem Beschwerdeführer wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren Prozesskostenhilfe ohne Ratenzahlung bewilligt und Rechtsanwalt Dr. W., beigeordnet.","basis":"source_field","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":{"text":"§ 22 Abs 1 S 1 BVerfGG, § 114 S 1 ZPO, § 22 Abs 1 S 1 ZPO","author":"dokumentationsstelle","source":null},"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Besigheim","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Besigheim","date":"2008-04-28","docket":"4 F 276/08","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Stuttgart","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Stuttgart","date":"2008-09-17","docket":"15 WF 167/08","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2010-01-29","docket":"1 BvR 3031/08","decision_type":"Prozesskostenhilfebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100129.1bvr303108","id":"bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2010-01-29/1-bvr-3031-08","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-07-03T20:59:34.668533+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}