{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:150322BXIZR215.21.0","court":"BGH","senate":"11. Zivilsenat","decided":"2022-03-15","aktenzeichen":"XI ZR 215/21","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nXI ZR 215/21\n\nvom\n\n15. März 2022\n\nin dem Rechtsstreit\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2022:150322BXIZR215.21.0\n\nDer XI. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 15. März 2022 durch den\nVizepräsidenten Prof. Dr. Ellenberger, die Richterinnen Dr. Menges und Dr. Derstadt,\nden Richter Dr. Schild von Spannenberg sowie die Richterin Ettl\n\nbeschlossen:\n\nDie Verfahrensverbindung in Nummer I des Senatsbeschlusses vom\n31. Januar 2022 (XI ZR 113/21, WM 2022, 420) wird aufgehoben, soweit\nsie das Verfahren G. gegen O. Bank Niederlassung\nDeutschland betrifft (§ 150 Satz 1 ZPO). Dieses Verfahren läuft wieder\nunter dem Aktenzeichen XI ZR 215/21.\n\nDie Kläger werden, nachdem sie die Revision gegen den Beschluss des\n24. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Frankfurt am Main in Darmstadt\nvom 9. März 2021 zurückgenommen haben, dieses Rechtsmittels für\nverlustig erklärt.\n\nDie Kosten der Revision werden ihnen auferlegt (§§ 565 Satz 1,\n516 Abs. 3 ZPO).\n\nStreitwert: bis 25.000 €\n\nEllenberger Menges Derstadt\n\nSchild von Spannenberg Ettl\n\nVorinstanzen:\nLG Darmstadt, Entscheidung vom 21.02.2020 - 1 O 343/18 -\nOLG Frankfurt in Darmstadt, Entscheidung vom 09.03.2021 - 24 U 127/20 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 150","ref_norm":"150","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 516","ref_norm":"516","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 565","ref_norm":"565","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","retrieved":"2026-10-24 08:02:31.824095+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"11. Zivilsenat","date":"2022-03-15","dockets":["XI ZR 215/21"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:150322BXIZR215.21.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:150322BXIZR215.21.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 15.03.2022 – XI ZR 215/21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"ZPO/150","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"150","label":"§ 150 ZPO","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/516","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"516","label":"§ 516 ZPO","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/565","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"565","label":"§ 565 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG München I","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG München I","date":"2020-08-27","docket":"29 O 7052/20","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG München","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG München","date":"2021-02-22","docket":"19 U 5456/20","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2022-01-31","docket":"XI ZR 113/21, XI ZR 144/21, XI ZR 196/21, XI ZR 215/21, XI ZR 228/21, XI ZR 279/21, XI ZR 304/21","decision_type":"EuGH-Vorlage","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:310122BXIZR113.21.0","id":"bgh/2022-01-31/xi-zr-113-21-xi-zr-144-21-xi-zr-196-21-xi-zr-215-21-xi-zr-228-21-xi-zr-279-21-xi-zr-304-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-01-31/xi-zr-113-21-xi-zr-144-21-xi-zr-196-21-xi-zr-215-21-xi-zr-228-21-xi-zr-279-21-xi-zr-304-21","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2022-03-15","docket":"XI ZR 215/21","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:150322BXIZR215.21.0","id":"bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-03-15/xi-zr-215-21","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2022-03-22","docket":"XI ZR 279/21","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:220322BXIZR279.21.0","id":"bgh/2022-03-22/xi-zr-279-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2022-03-22/xi-zr-279-21","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2024-06-04","docket":"XI ZR 113/21","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:040624UXIZR113.21.0","id":"bgh/2024-06-04/xi-zr-113-21","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2024-06-04/xi-zr-113-21","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":7,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2024-10-15","docket":"XI ZR 39/24","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:151024UXIZR39.24.0","id":"bgh/2024-10-15/xi-zr-39-24","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2024-10-15/xi-zr-39-24","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T08:02:31.824095+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}