{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:270820B4STR654.19.0","court":"BGH","senate":"4. Strafsenat","decided":"2020-08-27","aktenzeichen":"4 StR 654/19","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\n4 StR 654/19\n\nvom\n27. August 2020\nin der Strafsache\ngegen\n\nwegen Fälschung beweiserheblicher Daten u.a.\n\nhier: Befangenheitsantrag des Angeklagten, beim Bundesgerichtshof\neingegangen am 16. August 2020 (datiert auf 10. Mai 2020)\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2020:270820B4STR654.19.0\n\nDer 4. Strafsenats des Bundesgerichtshofs hat nach Anhörung der Verfahrensbeteiligten am 27. August 2020 beschlossen:\n\nDer am 16. August 2020 beim Bundesgerichtshof eingegangene\n(und auf 10. Mai 2020 datierte) Befangenheitsantrag des Angeklagten wird als unzulässig verworfen.\n\nGründe:\n\n1 Der Befangenheitsantrag ist – unabhängig davon, dass die abgelehnten\nRichter mit Ausnahme von Richter am Bundesgerichtshof Hoch nicht bezeichnet sind ‒ unzulässig, weil der Angeklagte keinen Grund zur Ablehnung im Sinne von § 26a Abs. 1 Nr. 2 StPO angegeben hat. Das Vorbringen des Angeklagten erschöpft sich weitgehend in eigenen Bewertungen und Behauptungen, die\nzur Rechtfertigung des Ablehnungsgesuchs völlig ungeeignet sind, und im Übrigen in Wiederholungen des Vorbringens in früheren Befangenheitsanträgen,\nüber die der Senat bereits entschieden hat. Beides steht dem gänzlichen Fehlen einer\n\nBegründung gleich (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 9. Juli 2015 – 1 StR 7/15; Beschluss vom 10. Juli 2014 – 3 StR 262/14, NStZ 2014, 725 f.; Beschluss vom\n15. November 2012 – 3 StR 239/12, NStZ-RR 2013, 153).\n\nSost-Scheible Quentin Bartel\n\nSturm Rommel\n\nVorinstanz:\nLandau (Pfalz), LG, 30.07.2019 ‒ 7111 Js 6783/17 1 KLs 2","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 26a","ref_norm":"26a","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:55:41.618186+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"4. Strafsenat","date":"2020-08-27","dockets":["4 StR 654/19"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:270820B4STR654.19.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:270820B4STR654.19.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 27.08.2020 – 4 StR 654/19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":{"text":"Der am 16. August 2020 beim Bundesgerichtshof eingegangene\n(und auf 10. Mai 2020 datierte) Befangenheitsantrag des Angeklagten wird als unzulässig verworfen.","basis":"court_formula","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"StPO/26a","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"26a","label":"§ 26a StPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Landau (Pfalz)","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Landau (Pfalz)","date":"2019-07-30","docket":"1 KLs 7111 Js 6783/17 (2)","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-05-20","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:200520B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-05-20/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-05-20/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-06-17","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:170620B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-06-17/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-06-17/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-06-25","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:250620B4STR654.19.1","id":"bgh/2020-06-25/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-06-25/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-06-29","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:290620B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-06-29/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-06-29/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":6,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-08-27","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:270820B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-08-27/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":7,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-08-28","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:280820B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-08-28/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-08-28/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":8,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-10-21","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:211020B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-10-21/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-10-21/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":9,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-11-09","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:091120B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-11-09/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-11-09/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":10,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-11-11","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:111120B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-11-11/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-11-11/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":11,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-11-19","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:191120B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2020-11-19/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-11-19/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":12,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2021-04-28","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:280421B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2021-04-28/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2021-04-28/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":13,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2021-05-12","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:120521B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2021-05-12/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2021-05-12/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":14,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2021-05-17","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:170521B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2021-05-17/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2021-05-17/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":15,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2021-05-19","docket":"4 StR 654/19","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2021:190521B4STR654.19.0","id":"bgh/2021-05-19/4-str-654-19","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2021-05-19/4-str-654-19","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:55:41.618186+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}