{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:131218BVZB71.18.0","court":"BGH","senate":"5. Zivilsenat","decided":"2018-12-13","aktenzeichen":"V ZB 71/18","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nV ZB 71/18\n\nvom\n\n13. Dezember 2018\n\nin dem Teilungsversteigerungsverfahren\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2018:131218BVZB71.18.0\n\nDer V. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 13. Dezember 2018 durch die\nVorsitzende Richterin Dr. Stresemann, die Richterin Weinland und die Richter\nDr. Kazele, Dr. Göbel und Dr. Hamdorf\n\nbeschlossen:\n\nDer in dem Schreiben der Beteiligten zu 1 vom 10. Dezember 2018 enthaltene Antrag auf Bestellung eines Notanwalts\ngemäß § 78b Abs. 1 ZPO wird zurückgewiesen, weil sie trotz der\nMitteilung der Beendigung des Mandatsverhältnisses weiter durch\neinen bei dem Bundesgerichtshof zugelassenen Rechtsanwalt\nvertreten ist (§ 87 Abs. 1 ZPO), der die Rechtsbeschwerde\nfristgemäß eingelegt und begründet hat. Zudem erscheint die\nRechtsverfolgung aus den in dem Beschluss des Senats vom\n15. November 2018 dargelegten Gründen aussichtslos.\n\nStresemann Weinland Kazele\n\nGöbel Hamdorf\n\nVorinstanzen:\n\nAG Alsfeld, Entscheidung vom 15.03.2017 - 33 K 37/13 -\nLG Gießen, Entscheidung vom 20.04.2018 - 7 T 128/17; 7 T 153/18; 7 T 154/18 -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 78b","ref_norm":"78b","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 87","ref_norm":"87","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:59:23.260834+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Zivilsenat","date":"2018-12-13","dockets":["V ZB 71/18"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:131218BVZB71.18.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:131218BVZB71.18.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 13.12.2018 – V ZB 71/18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"ZPO/78b","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"78b","label":"§ 78b ZPO","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/87","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"87","label":"§ 87 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"AG Alsfeld","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"AG Alsfeld","date":"2017-03-15","docket":"33 K 37/13","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"LG Gießen","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Gießen","date":"2018-04-20","docket":"7 T 128/17","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2018-11-15","docket":"V ZB 71/18","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:151118BVZB71.18.0","id":"bgh/2018-11-15/v-zb-71-18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-11-15/v-zb-71-18","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2018-12-13","docket":"V ZB 71/18","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2018:131218BVZB71.18.0","id":"bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2018-12-13/v-zb-71-18","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":5,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2020-02-06","docket":"V ZB 71/18","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:060220BVZB71.18.0","id":"bgh/2020-02-06/v-zb-71-18","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2020-02-06/v-zb-71-18","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:59:23.260834+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}