{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:081117BKZR59.16.0","court":"BGH","senate":"Kartellsenat","decided":"2017-11-08","aktenzeichen":"KZR 59/16","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nKZR 59/16\n\nvom\n\n8. November 2017\n\nin dem Rechtsstreit\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2017:081117BKZR59.16.0\n\nDer Kartellsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 8. November 2017 durch die\nPräsidentin des Bundesgerichtshofs Limperg, den Vorsitzenden Richter Dr. Raum\nund die Richter Dr. Bacher, Sunder und Dr. Deichfuß\n\nbeschlossen:\n\nDer Streitwert für die Revision wird in Abänderung der Festsetzung im\nBeschluss vom 17. Oktober 2017 auf 25.000 € festgesetzt.\n\nGründe:\n\n1 Die Streitwertfestsetzung war von Amts wegen gemäß § 63 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 GKG\nabzuändern. Der Streitwert war wegen eines Schreibversehens auf 250.000 € statt\nrichtigerweise 25.000 € festgesetzt worden.\n\nLimperg Raum Bacher\n\nSunder Deichfuß\n\nVorinstanzen:\nLG Hannover, Entscheidung vom 25.08.2015 - 18 O 91/15 -\nOLG Celle, Entscheidung vom 07.04.2016 - 13 U 124/15 (Kart) -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"GKG 2004","ref":"§ 63","ref_norm":"63","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:51:40.719821+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"Kartellsenat","date":"2017-11-08","dockets":["KZR 59/16"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:081117BKZR59.16.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:081117BKZR59.16.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 08.11.2017 – KZR 59/16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":{"text":"Der Streitwert für die Revision wird in Abänderung der Festsetzung im\nBeschluss vom 17. Oktober 2017 auf 25.000 € festgesetzt.","basis":"court_formula","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"GKG-2004/63","law":"GKG-2004","abbreviation":"GKG 2004","ref":"63","label":"§ 63 GKG 2004","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Hannover","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hannover","date":"2015-08-25","docket":"18 O 91/15","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Celle","court_id":"olg-celle","court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht Celle","date":"2016-04-07","docket":"13 U 124/15 (Kart)","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"olg-celle/2016-04-07/13-u-124-15-kart","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-celle/2016-04-07/13-u-124-15-kart","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2017-10-17","docket":"KZR 59/16","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:171017UKZR59.16.0","id":"bgh/2017-10-17/kzr-59-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-10-17/kzr-59-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2017-11-08","docket":"KZR 59/16","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:081117BKZR59.16.0","id":"bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-11-08/kzr-59-16","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:51:40.719821+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}