{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:171116BIXZR113.16.0","court":"BGH","senate":"9. Zivilsenat","decided":"2016-11-17","aktenzeichen":"IX ZR 113/16","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nIX ZR 113/16\nvom\n\n17. November 2016\n\nin dem Rechtsstreit\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2016:171116BIXZR113.16.0\n\nDer IX. Zivilsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat durch den Vorsitzenden Richter\nProf. Dr. Kayser, die Richterin Lohmann, die Richter Prof. Dr. Pape,\nDr. Schoppmeyer und Meyberg\n\nam 17. November 2016\nbeschlossen:\n\nDem Beklagten wird auf Antrag Wiedereinsetzung in die Fristen\nzur Einlegung und Begründung der Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde\ngegen den die Berufung zurückweisen Beschluss des 3. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Celle vom 2. Mai 2016 gewährt.\n\nKayser Lohmann Pape\n\nSchoppmeyer Meyberg","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","cited_norms":[],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","retrieved":"2026-10-24 08:01:00.336248+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"9. Zivilsenat","date":"2016-11-17","dockets":["IX ZR 113/16"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:171116BIXZR113.16.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:171116BIXZR113.16.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 17.11.2016 – IX ZR 113/16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Hannover","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Hannover","date":"2015-09-08","docket":"20 O 46/14","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":2,"court":"OLG Celle","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Celle","date":"2016-05-02","docket":"3 U 181/15","decision_type":null,"ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":3,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-11-17","docket":"IX ZR 113/16","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:171116BIXZR113.16.0","id":"bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-17/ix-zr-113-16","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":4,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2017-02-02","docket":"IX ZR 113/16","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2017:020217BIXZR113.16.0","id":"bgh/2017-02-02/ix-zr-113-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2017-02-02/ix-zr-113-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T08:01:00.336248+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}