{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR19.15.0","court":"BGH","senate":"Kartellsenat","decided":"2016-09-14","aktenzeichen":"EnZR 19/15","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\nEnZR 19/15\nvom\n\n14. September 2016\n\nin dem Rechtsstreit\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR19.15.0\n\nDer Kartellsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 14. September 2016 durch die Präsidentin des Bundesgerichtshofs Limperg, den Vorsitzenden Richter Dr. Raum sowie\ndie Richter Dr. Kirchhoff, Dr. Grüneberg und Dr. Bacher beschlossen:\n\nDie Gehörsrüge der Klägerin gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom\n12. Juli 2016 wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.\n\nGründe:\n\n1 Die gemäß § 321a ZPO statthafte und auch im Übrigen zulässige Anhörungsrüge ist nicht begründet. Der Senat hat den Anspruch der Klägerin auf rechtliches\nGehör nicht verletzt (§ 321a Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2, Abs. 4 Satz 3 ZPO).\n\n2 Die Gerichte sind nach Art. 103 Abs. 1 GG verpflichtet, das Vorbringen der\nParteien zur Kenntnis zu nehmen und in Erwägung zu ziehen. Der Senat hat vor der\nBeschlussfassung am 12. Juli 2016 umfassend geprüft, ob eine Beschwerde der\nKlägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des Kartellsenats des\nOberlandesgerichts Naumburg vom 23. April 2015 Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet und dies\naus den in dem Senatsbeschluss dargelegten Erwägungen verneint. Einer weitergehenden Begründung bedurfte der Beschluss entsprechend § 544 Abs. 4 Satz 2\n\nHalbs. 2 ZPO nicht. Dasselbe gilt für die vorliegende Entscheidung über die Gehörsrüge (vgl. BGH, Beschlüsse vom 19. Mai 2011 - V ZA 35/10, juris Rn. 2, vom\n8. Januar 2015 - IX ZA 9/13, juris Rn. 2 und vom 9. März 2016 - XI ZA 14/14, juris\nRn. 2). Soweit die Klägerin mit der Anhörungsrüge ihren Vortrag aus der Beschwerdeinstanz wiederholt, kann die Anhörungsrüge damit nicht begründet werden.\n\nLimperg Raum Kirchhoff\n\nGrüneberg Bacher\n\nVorinstanzen:\nLG Magdeburg, Entscheidung vom 05.12.2012 - 36 O 205/11 -\nOLG Naumburg, Entscheidung vom 23.04.2015 - 2 U 5/13 (Kart) -","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"GG","ref":"Art 103","ref_norm":"103","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 321a","ref_norm":"321a","n":1},{"jurabk":"ZPO","ref":"§ 544","ref_norm":"544","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:51:39.632649+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"Kartellsenat","date":"2016-09-14","dockets":["EnZR 19/15"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR19.15.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR19.15.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 14.09.2016 – EnZR 19/15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":{"text":"Die Gehörsrüge der Klägerin gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom\n12. Juli 2016 wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.","basis":"court_formula","source":null},"tenor_status":"held","cited_norms":[{"id":"GG/103","law":"GG","abbreviation":"GG","ref":"103","label":"Art 103 GG","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/321a","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"321a","label":"§ 321a ZPO","mentions":1},{"id":"ZPO/544","law":"ZPO","abbreviation":"ZPO","ref":"544","label":"§ 544 ZPO","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[{"position":1,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":"lg-magdeburg","court_as_stated":"Landgericht Magdeburg","date":"2012-12-05","docket":"36 O 205/11","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:LGMAGDE:2012:1205.36O205.11.0A","id":"lg-magdeburg/2012-12-05/36-o-205-11","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/lg-magdeburg/2012-12-05/36-o-205-11","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":2,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":"lg-magdeburg","court_as_stated":"Landgericht Magdeburg","date":"2012-12-05","docket":"36 O 260/10","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:LGMAGDE:2012:1205.36O260.10.0A","id":"lg-magdeburg/2012-12-05/36-o-260-10","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/lg-magdeburg/2012-12-05/36-o-260-10","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":3,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Magdeburg","date":"2013-01-31","docket":"36 O 205/11","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":4,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Magdeburg","date":"2013-01-31","docket":"36 O 260/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":5,"court":"LG Dortmund","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Dortmund","date":"2013-06-13","docket":"16 O 197/11 (Kart)","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":6,"court":"LG Düsseldorf","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Düsseldorf","date":"2013-07-01","docket":"37 O 62/11 (Kart)","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":7,"court":"LG Düsseldorf","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Düsseldorf","date":"2013-08-19","docket":"37 O 62/11 (Kart)","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":8,"court":"LG Dortmund","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Dortmund","date":"2013-10-17","docket":"16 O 197/11 (Kart)","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":9,"court":"OLG Düsseldorf","court_id":"olg-duesseldorf","court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf","date":"2014-08-13","docket":"VI-2 U (Kart) 2/13","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:OLGD:2014:0813.VI2U.KART2.13.00","id":"olg-duesseldorf/2014-08-13/vi-2-u-kart-2-13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-duesseldorf/2014-08-13/vi-2-u-kart-2-13","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":10,"court":"OLG Düsseldorf","court_id":"olg-duesseldorf","court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf","date":"2014-10-01","docket":"VI-2 U (Kart) 1/13","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":"ECLI:DE:OLGD:2014:1001.VI2U.KART1.13.00","id":"olg-duesseldorf/2014-10-01/vi-2-u-kart-1-13","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-duesseldorf/2014-10-01/vi-2-u-kart-1-13","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":11,"court":"OLG Düsseldorf","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"OLG Düsseldorf","date":"2014-11-05","docket":"VI-2 U (Kart) 2/13","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":12,"court":"OLG Naumburg","court_id":"olg-naumburg","court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht Naumburg","date":"2015-04-23","docket":"2 U 5/13 (Kart)","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":"olg-naumburg/2015-04-23/2-u-5-13-kart","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/olg-naumburg/2015-04-23/2-u-5-13-kart","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":13,"court":"OLG Sachsen-Anhalt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt","date":"2015-04-23","docket":"2 U 6/13 (Kart","decision_type":"Urteil","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":14,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Magdeburg","date":"2015-06-12","docket":"36 O 205/11","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":15,"court":"LG Magdeburg","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"LG Magdeburg","date":"2015-06-12","docket":"36 O 260/10","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":16,"court":"OLG Sachsen-Anhalt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt","date":"2015-08-24","docket":"2 U 5/13 (Kart)","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":17,"court":"OLG Sachsen-Anhalt","court_id":null,"court_as_stated":"Oberlandesgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt","date":"2015-08-24","docket":"2 U 6/13","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"id":null,"url":null,"is_this_decision":false,"is_held":false},{"position":18,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2015-10-06","docket":"EnZR 50/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2015:061015BENZR50.14.0","id":"bgh/2015-10-06/enzr-50-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2015-10-06/enzr-50-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":19,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2015-10-06","docket":"EnZR 72/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2015:061015BENZR72.14.0","id":"bgh/2015-10-06/enzr-72-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2015-10-06/enzr-72-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":20,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-03-08","docket":"EnZR 50/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:080316BENZR50.14.0","id":"bgh/2016-03-08/enzr-50-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-03-08/enzr-50-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":21,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-03-08","docket":"EnZR 72/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:080316BENZR72.14.0","id":"bgh/2016-03-08/enzr-72-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-03-08/enzr-72-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":22,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-05-11","docket":"EnZR 50/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:110516BENZR50.14.0","id":"bgh/2016-05-11/enzr-50-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-05-11/enzr-50-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":23,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-05-11","docket":"EnZR 72/14","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:110516BENZR72.14.0","id":"bgh/2016-05-11/enzr-72-14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-05-11/enzr-72-14","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":24,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-07-12","docket":"EnZR 19/15","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:120716BENZR19.15.0","id":"bgh/2016-07-12/enzr-19-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-07-12/enzr-19-15","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":25,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-07-12","docket":"EnZR 20/15","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:120716BENZR20.15.0","id":"bgh/2016-07-12/enzr-20-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-07-12/enzr-20-15","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":26,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-09-14","docket":"EnZR 20/15","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR20.15.0","id":"bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-20-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-20-15","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true},{"position":27,"court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","date":"2016-09-14","docket":"EnZR 19/15","decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:140916BENZR19.15.0","id":"bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-09-14/enzr-19-15","is_this_decision":true,"is_held":true},{"position":28,"court":"BVerfG","court_id":"bverfg","court_as_stated":"BVerfG","date":"2017-09-26","docket":"1 BvR 1486/16, 1 BvR 1487/16, 1 BvR 2490/16, 1 BvR 2491/16","decision_type":"Nichtannahmebeschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170926.1bvr148616","id":"bverfg/2017-09-26/1-bvr-1486-16-1-bvr-1487-16-1-bvr-2490-16-1-bvr-2491-16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bverfg/2017-09-26/1-bvr-1486-16-1-bvr-1487-16-1-bvr-2490-16-1-bvr-2491-16","is_this_decision":false,"is_held":true}],"has_records":true,"note":"As the courts' records state it (getProceeding). No outcome is given."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:51:39.632649+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}