{"status":"available","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:081116B5STR437.16.0","court":"BGH","senate":"5. Strafsenat","decided":"2016-11-08","aktenzeichen":"5 StR 437/16","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\n5 StR 437/16\n\nvom\n8. November 2016\nin der Strafsache\ngegen\n\n1.\n\n2.\n\nwegen Handeltreibens mit Betäubungsmitteln in nicht geringer Menge u.a.\n\nECLI:DE:BGH:2016:081116B5STR437.16.0\n\nDer 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 8. November 2016 beschlossen:\n\nDie Revisionen der Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 30. Mai 2016 werden nach § 349 Abs. 2 StPO\nals unbegründet verworfen.\n\nJeder Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu\ntragen.\n\nErgänzend bemerkt der Senat:\n\nWohl entgegen der Auffassung der Revision des Angeklagten T. war dieser\nhinsichtlich des Verbrechens der Einfuhr von Betäubungsmitteln in nicht geringer Menge (§ 30 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 BtMG) Alleintäter.\n\nSander Dölp König\n\nBellay Feilcke","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-08/5-str-437-16","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 349","ref_norm":"349","n":1},{"jurabk":"BtMG 1981","ref":"§ 30","ref_norm":"30","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-08/5-str-437-16","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:56:18.734532+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2016-11-08/5-str-437-16","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Strafsenat","date":"2016-11-08","dockets":["5 StR 437/16"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:081116B5STR437.16.0","ids":{"ecli":"ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:081116B5STR437.16.0"},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 08.11.2016 – 5 StR 437/16","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2016-11-08/5-str-437-16","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"StPO/349","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"349","label":"§ 349 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"BtMG-1981/30","law":"BtMG-1981","abbreviation":"BtMG 1981","ref":"30","label":"§ 30 BtMG 1981","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[],"has_records":false,"note":"No Verfahrensgang record names this decision. That says nothing about whether earlier or later decisions exist."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:56:18.734532+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}