{"status":"available","doknr":"CEBGH-BGH_Strafsenat-5_NA_2014-11-25_5_StR_490_14_NA_NA_0","ecli":null,"court":"BGH","senate":"5. Strafsenat","decided":"2014-11-25","aktenzeichen":"5 StR 490/14","doktyp":"Beschluss","leitsatz":null,"text_plain":"BUNDESGERICHTSHOF\nBESCHLUSS\n5 StR 490/14\n\nvom\n25. November 2014\nin der Strafsache\ngegen\n\nwegen Geldwäsche\n\nDer 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs hat am 25. November 2014 beschlossen:\n\nDie Revision der Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts\nBerlin vom 5. Juni 2014 wird nach § 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegründet verworfen.\n\nDie Beschwerdeführerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.\n\nIm Blick auf die erfolgte Negativmitteilung (§ 243 Abs. 4 Satz 1 StPO) und die\nkategorische Ablehnung jeglicher Verständigungsbereitschaft durch die Strafkammer im letzten Hauptverhandlungstermin bedurfte es eines ausdrücklichen\nNegativattests (§ 273 Abs. 1a Satz 3 StPO) nicht mehr.\n\nDie Einziehung gemäß § 261 Abs. 7 StGB betrifft Beziehungsgegenstände und\ndurfte daher bei der Strafzumessung nicht strafmildernd berücksichtigt werden\n(vgl. auch BGH, Urteil vom 20. August 2013 – 5 StR 248/13 Rn. 2).\n\nSander Schneider Dölp\n\nKönig Bellay","source":null,"source_url":null,"url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2014-11-25/5-str-490-14","cited_norms":[{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 243","ref_norm":"243","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 273","ref_norm":"273","n":1},{"jurabk":"StPO","ref":"§ 349","ref_norm":"349","n":1},{"jurabk":"StGB","ref":"§ 261","ref_norm":"261","n":1}],"authoritative_source":null,"attribution":null,"source_info":{"name":"nu:legal Deutsches Recht","operator":"Nulegal GmbH","terms":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/nutzungsbedingungen","attribution":"Source: nu:legal – recht.nulegal.eu","license_url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/license","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2014-11-25/5-str-490-14","retrieved":"2026-10-24 07:56:12.643245+00:00"},"card":{"id":"bgh/2014-11-25/5-str-490-14","court":"BGH","court_id":"bgh","court_as_stated":"BGH","panel":"5. Strafsenat","date":"2014-11-25","dockets":["5 StR 490/14"],"decision_type":"Beschluss","ecli":null,"ids":{"doknr":"CEBGH-BGH_Strafsenat-5_NA_2014-11-25_5_StR_490_14_NA_NA_0","ecli":null},"cite_as":"BGH, Beschluss vom 25.11.2014 – 5 StR 490/14","url":"https://recht.nulegal.eu/rechtsprechung/bgh/2014-11-25/5-str-490-14","headnotes":[],"leitsatz_status":"not_captured","tenor":null,"tenor_status":"not_marked","cited_norms":[{"id":"StPO/243","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"243","label":"§ 243 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/273","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"273","label":"§ 273 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"StPO/349","law":"StPO","abbreviation":"StPO","ref":"349","label":"§ 349 StPO","mentions":1},{"id":"StGB/261","law":"StGB","abbreviation":"StGB","ref":"261","label":"§ 261 StGB","mentions":1}],"cited_norms_basis":"extracted_from_text","normenkette":null,"proceeding":{"entries":[],"has_records":false,"note":"No Verfahrensgang record names this decision. That says nothing about whether earlier or later decisions exist."},"fundstellen":[],"provenance":{"source":null,"source_url":null,"retrieved_at":"2026-10-24T07:56:12.643245+00:00","text_quality":"native","attribution":null},"ai_summary":null,"ai_summary_available":false}}